The Art of Creating Art

Often times, the process of making art can be a thing of beauty onto itself. This has been beautifully conveyed by a video from the California-based American Museum of Ceramic Art, which depicts several ceramics masters creating a masterpiece as part of the 5,000-year ceramics tradition of Icheon, South Korea.

The seven-minute video is beautifully done in its presentation; it made me feel at peace during my lunch break. The focus on each craftsman’s precision, patience, and attention to detail is breathtaking, highlighting just how much goes into those beautiful artistic pieces we so effortlessly view and admire.

The video was released in 2013 to mark the first-ever exhibition of over 230 Korean ceramic pieces on American soil. Unfortunately, “ICHEON: Reviving the Korean Ceramics Traditions”, has long since passed, although you can see some photos and information about it here. I’d definitely love to pay a visit to this interesting museum someday.

Video is courtesy of WIMP.com and my dear friend Drake for bringing it to my attention.

A Hidden Gem of the Mediterranean — Valletta, Malta

 

Valletta is the capital of Malta, an island nation of around 400,000 people located in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea, about 50 miles south of Sicily. One of the world’s smallest and most-densely populated countries, Malta has been inhabited since 5,200 BCE and is brimming with history and culture — some of the world’s oldest free-standing structures can be found here. The country’s strategic location has led to its changing hands numerous times throughout history, being ruled and influenced by dozens of distinct cultures and nations.

This is one reason why Valletta is such a jewel. Built during the rule of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, also known as Knights Hospitaller, the city contains a rich collection of architectural styles from the 16th century onward, mostly Baroque followed by elements of Mannerist, Neo-Classical and Modern architecture. The City of Valletta is so beautiful and well preserved that is was officially recognized as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1980.

The official name given by the Order of Saint John was “Humilissima Civitas Valletta” — The Most Humble City of Valletta, or Città Umilissima in Italian. The beauty of the city’s churches, gardens, and palaces earned it the nickname among European elites as “Superbissima” — Most Proud. I certainly agree with that sentiment.

 

The Eagle Huntress of Mongolia

Ashol Pan, 13-year-old Eagle Huntress , Mongolia Ashol Pan, 13-year-old Eagle Huntress , Mongolia II Ashol Pan, 13-year-old Eagle Huntress , Mongolia III Ashol Pan, 13-year-old Eagle Huntress , Mongolia IV Ashol Pan, 13-year-old Eagle Huntress , Mongolia V Ashol Pan, 13-year-old Eagle Huntress , Mongolia VI

This is Ashol-Pan, a 13-year-old Kazakh eagle huntress living in the rugged Altai Mountains of western Mongolia. The daughter of a famous hunter, she’s one of only 400 practicing eagle hunters, and the only known female to ever partake in the tradition in its 2,000-year history.

The Kazakhs of the Altai mountains are the only people that hunt with golden eagles, which are taken from nests at a young age. Females are chosen due to their larger size — the typical adult is around 15 pounds, with a wingspan of over 90 inches. Hunts occur in winter, when the temperatures can drop to -40F. Hunters work in teams, trekking on horseback for days in order to reach a mountain or ridge for a better view. When an animal is spotted, riders charge towards it to flush it into the open, and an eagle is released. If the eagle fails to make a kill, another is released.

After years of service, a hunter releases his mature eagle once and for all during the spring, leaving a slaughtered sheep as a farewell present. This ensures that the eagles go back to nature and have their own strong newborns, for both their future and those of the hunters that depend on them.

Source: BBC

Link

TV Host Gets Plastic Surgery to “Get Ahead”

Julie Chen, who’s hosted several prominent television series , recently admitted to having undergone eyelid surgery many years ago in order to look “less Chinese.”

Chen was working as a local reporter in Dayton, Ohio, almost 20 years ago and wanted a chance to be an anchor. What her news director told her at age 25 is pretty startling.

“He said, ‘You will never be on this anchor desk, because you’re Chinese,’” Chen revealed to her co-hosts. ”He said, ‘Let’s face it Julie, how relatable are you to our community? … Because of your Asian eyes, sometimes I’ve noticed that when you’re on camera and you’re interviewing someone, you look disinterested, you look bored because your eyes are so heavy, they are so small.’”

Chen said his speech felt like a dagger to her heart.

“It felt like a weird, grown-up version of racism in the workplace,” she added. “I started developing a complex.”

To make matters worse, she met with agents for career advice, only to hear from a “big-time” agent, “‘I cannot represent you unless you get plastic surgery to make your eyes look bigger,’” Chen recalled. “And I did it.”

Stories like this are why I frankly don’t blame folks for getting cosmetic surgery. Given that so many people are savaged for their looks or pressured (directly or implicitly) to change their appearance, making such a decision is sadly understandable (albeit not in every case). There’s plenty of empirical and scientific evidence showing that attractive people have a natural edge in the way they’re treated, regarded, or judged in unrelated areas such as talent (e.g. the halo effect).

Granted, the pressure to look good — and the subsequent benefit of doing so — is nothing new. It’s just that there is now newer and better options for doing so. It’s interesting to note that people who get surgery receive a lot of flak for that decision as well, which drives home the point that unless you win the genetic lottery and happen to already look a certain way, you’re disadvantaged in certain areas or social circles regardless.

Chen’s decision is also indicative of the fact that beauty in our society, as well as in others influenced by our culture, is increasingly defined by looking as close to caucasian as possible. This is evident in the fact that few non-white women reach prominence in fashion, film, or other public venues, and those that do make it tend to look closer to “white” — hence why methods like skin bleaching and eyelid surgery have become more popular around the world.

To be clear, provided they do it safely and within reason, I don’t think anyone should receive  additional scrutiny nor be looked down upon for changing their appearance in this way. It’s yet another innovation in our historical, socially-conditioned obsession with beauty, just as make up, hair dye, and other methods once were. Granted, it’s the most long-lasting and radical means (so far), but the motivation and concept remains the same.

People are entitled to do what they will with their appearance, just as they’re allowed to let themselves go and defy standard conventions of beauty. Now, there are certainly cases where people are risking their health, finances, and (ironically) their appearance in order to look a certain way. It’s been argued that such instances denote psychological and personal problems that must be addressed. In that instance, I’d be worried and seek to get involved.

Of course, I’m not saying it’s necessarily good thing that people feel the need to go to these lengths, just that it’s unfortunately driven by social and (arguably) natural conditioning that’s difficult to resist. If we want to minimize the practice, we need to stop privileging attractiveness and telling people they can’t follow their dreams unless they look a certain way.

As always, however, I could be wrong, at which point I invite you to share your own thoughts. 

Demonstration of some physical principle I don’t understand

Eupraxsophy:

This is the most remarkable thing I’ve seen in awhile; science as an artform.

Originally posted on Why Evolution Is True:

Okay, some physics maven please explain this to me, and also why a few of the patterns formed by the sand are asymmetrical.  (I haven’t looked up the Chladni plate experiment.)

From io9, where the notes say this:

Stop what you’re doing and watch this. It’s a video of sand. Sand skittering around on a vibrating plate, to be exact. But what happens when that sand skitters is amazing. Trust us – this is something you want to see.

What you’re watching is the Chladni plate experiment, as performed by YouTube science-and-illusion wizard Brusspup (he can also coax water into a zig-zagging stream, and make Rubik’s Cubes that aren’t Rubik’s Cubes).

Oh, and as a special treat—because you’re good enough, you’re smart enough, and doggonit, people like you—here’s the Rubik’s cube illusion and other anamorphic illusions mentioned above. Be sure to watch for the felid at…

View original 4 more words

Beauty and Brains

I find it interesting that whenever a very attractive person — particularly a woman — demonstrates above-average intelligence or skill, it genuinely surprises most people. Similarly, I’ve seen people marvel at how a “nerdy” person can be athletic or charismatic. Needless to say, those peers who are both attractive and intelligent feel endless frustration at being reflexively labeled based solely on their looks and initial impression.

But this is nothing new, as humans were evolved to make quick judgements based little data — it’s a survival mechanism that has remained, often misapplied, in the modern world. In this instance, we seem to unconsciously associate good looks with stupidity or, at most, average intelligence (admittedly, I think even I have been guilty of this visceral stereotyping).

I’ve read a hypothesis suggesting that this correlation reflects a form of evolutionary compensation:  if one isn’t attractive, they make up for it by making themselves desirable in other ways; similarly, an unskilled or unintelligent person may harness whatever charisma or physical attractiveness they have to influence others or burnish their image. We see this pattern and therefore apply it in how we judge and analyze people.

In any case, it is interesting to note that traditionally (and for the most part to this day), heroic and virtuous characters in various media have almost always been portrayed as good looking, and intelligence is rarely shown to be mutually exclusive with physical attractiveness. Of course, this too likely reflects our evolutionarily-induced preference for well-rounded, attractive people.

Anyway, has anyone else noticed this? Is there a reason for these correlations? What are you thoughts on this?

Your Beautiful Eyes

It’s amazing what a change in perspective can do, either to the sense or towards are perception of reality. There’s beauty all around us, depending on where, how, and – more importantly - if we look. It’s easy to take for granted the strange and amazing worlds that exist out of sight and out of mind.

Thankfully, talented photographers like Suren Manvelyan of Armenia are uncovering amazing realms of aesthetic splendor, thanks to the wonder of human curiosity. It seems like a rather simple approach too: extreme close-ups of various human eyes, which I would never have though could create the sort of alien worlds like the following:

To think that our own eyes, which we’re rarely conscious of, harbor so much beauty.

There’s much more to see if you click here. Also check out the artist’s website here.

Cueva de las Manos

This is the Cueva de las Manos (Spanish for Cave of the Hands), a UNESCO World Heritage Site located in the province of Santa Cruz, Argentina (south of the town of Perito Moreno). Its name and claim to fame are obvious, although a variety of other art subjects are present. The art in the cave dates from 13,000 to 9,000 years ago, the oldest being 9,300 BCE. The site was last inhabited around 700 CE (or AD), possibly by ancestors of today’s Tehuelche people.

The age of the paintings was calculated from the remains of a very interesting tool: bone-made pipes used for spraying the paint. The inhabitants, who varied over time as different groups moved in and out, had actually developed stenciling, not an art style we usually associate with ancient people (note that most of the hands are left, suggesting that they used their right hands to hold the pipe).

The binder used to combine the paint is unknown, but these people were pretty sophisticated: they knew which mineral pigments to utilize and how to do so. Iron oxides, for example, were used to produce reds and purples, kaolin for white, natrojarosite for yellow, and manganese oxide for black. Art was serious business to them.

Other depictions include human beings, guanacosrheas, felines and other animals. Most amazing to me is the presence of geometric shapes and zigzag patterns, which shows that these people had conceptions of abstract art forms, rather than merely painting what they saw (although humans probably developed that far earlier anyway, it’s still fascinating to see it on display given the popular perception of prehistoric people as lacking such cognitive abilities).

There are also naturalistic portrayals of a variety of informative hunting techniques, including the use of bolas, a throwing weapon that was used like a sling. Perhaps they were just depicting everyday life, but maybe this was meant to be educational. I’d like to think they sat their kids down and went over these images like a teacher at a chalkboard.

Curiously, there are also red dots on the ceilings, probably made by submerging their hunting bolas in ink, and then throwing them up in the air. This suggests that these folks might have been experimenting with different art forms, although perhaps it was just some sort of ritual or form of practice.

Either way, it must be breathtaking to see this in person, to be able to put my hands close and realize that these were the physical marks of human beings just like me. And wonder what else they did in their spare time? What was their idea of fun? Maybe this art was recreational rather than utilitarian? Either way, it’s beautiful and a wonderful reminder of where we came from.

What Makes a Human

A human is made of the following:

  • Oxygen (65%)
  • Carbon (18%)
  • Hydrogen (10%)
  • Nitrogen (3%)
  • Calcium (1.5%)
  • Phosphorus (1.0%)
  • Potassium (0.35%)
  • Sulfur (0.25%)
  • Sodium (0.15%)
  • Iron (0.70%)
  • Magnesium (0.05%)
  • And trace amounts of Copper, Zinc, Selenium, Molybdenum, Fluorine, Chlorine, Iodine, Manganese, Cobalt,  Lithium, Strontium, Aluminum, Silicon, Lead, Vanadium, Arsenic, Bromine.

It’s hard to realize that everything we are, down to the smallest sub-atomic level, is a product of nature. We share the same origins and atoms of a tree, rock, insect, or star. Everything around us, everything in this entire universe, has the same origin. How strange it is that we’re all so connected in this way.

And just as our bodies are made off the atoms of previous organisms and stars, so too will future substances contains our atoms once we die. Nothing is ever destroyed. Our matter merely moves on to take another form, to make up some other part of our wonderful universe. As a great physicist once said, we are literally made out of star stuff – and visa versa.